« Mullholland Drive explained | Main | Black people need to learn their place!... »

Kerry's plan vs. reality

It's a lot easier (and more fun!) to criticize the job someone else is doing than to do a better job yourself. So far, the closest thing Kerry has offered to an Iraq policy is a vague promise to broaden international participation in the occupation, allowing our troops to shoulder a lighter burden. There's just one eensy problem:


Allies Not in Formation on Kerry's Troops Plan

By Paul Richter and Maria L. La Ganga, Times Staff Writers

WASHINGTON -- Democratic presidential candidate John F. Kerry has staked much of his campaign on a proposal he hopes will convince voters that he can extricate the United States from Iraq more quickly and at less cost than President Bush.

But Kerry's plan, which promises to effectively shift much of the Iraq war burden from America to its allies, so far is failing to receive the international support the proposal must have to succeed.

Kerry in recent appearances and interviews has been intensifying his effort to spotlight what he sees as the Bush administration's mistakes in Iraq -- especially the failure to broaden international involvement -- as a fundamental difference between the two candidates. But Kerry's proposals depend on changing the minds of foreign leaders who do not want to defy their electorates by sending forces into what many consider to be a U.S.-made mess.

"I understand why John Kerry is making proposals of this kind, but there is a lack of realism in them," Menzies Campbell, a British lawmaker who is a spokesman on defense issues for the Liberal Democratic Party, said in a typical comment.

Many allied countries may welcome a new team in Washington after years of friction with the Bush administration. But foreign leaders are making it clear they don't want to add enough of their own troops to allow U.S. forces to scale back to a minority share in Iraq, as Kerry has proposed.