Some questions
I know everybody's sick of Memogate already, but I've got some questions. The Lefties would have us believe this issue of forgery by a major network is a mere distraction. We should really focus on the underlying story, right?
Remember the forged Niger-Uranium documents? Weren't these same people telling us that the forgery discounted the entire story? And even later, when independent, corroborating evidence backed up the "underlying story," they were still dismissive. The forged documents tainted everything. Remember that?
And remember those "purloined" Senate Judiciary Committee memos? It seems that the Left didn't want to discuss the content of them at all (strategies for stonewalling judicial appointees). The content didn't matter! The only thing that mattered was that the documents were tainted! To discuss their content was to unacceptably change the subject from our damnable guilt!
Remember that? Why the double standard?
Heh, at least our documents were real.