Sorry, but this is animal abuse
The puppies are cute, but the story pissed be off. Look, I know that breeds like these like to work, to a certain extent, and enjoy having a purpose. Nonetheless, service animals have a hard life. It's one thing to press them into a lifetime of service to help a blind person lead a more independent lifestyle, or to sniff out bombs in luggage, but to detect pirated "300" DVDs? Sorry, but that's a bit much.
Comments
It does seem to be overkill, doesn't it?
Posted by: K | March 14, 2007 12:56 PM
I'm with you on this one.
Sniff for bombs that can be used against people, not bad copies of "Dreamgirls"
Posted by: Rachel | March 14, 2007 01:45 PM
This is reckless endangerment! What if one of these poor animals came across a copy of "Inconvenient Truth"?
(Oh- what am I saying? Who would bother to bootleg that?)
Posted by: Paul Moore | March 15, 2007 02:30 AM
To protect the profits of Corporations, any abuse is tolerated. Just don't smack them on the nose for peeing on your bad -- that's cruel.
Posted by: Bailey Hankins | March 15, 2007 04:48 PM
"Sniff for bombs that can be used against people, not bad copies of "Dreamgirls" (Rachel)
Sniffing for bad copies of Dreamgirls....there's a lyrically erotic quality to that image, that I just can't put my finger on.
But I'll continue to ponder it, mostly because I can't get that image out of my head now.
Posted by: JMK | March 17, 2007 03:36 PM